What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT workforce frozen in shock.

Had the risk been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct risk detection and mitigation framework might need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from the greatest risk intelligence instruments at present.

With their insights, I seen the demand for multi-source knowledge aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time risk detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven knowledge privateness, and contextual risk intelligence, that are key options in risk intelligence instruments that may stop disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to investigate and consider 7 greatest risk intelligence instruments available in the market at present to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and scale back the dependency on handbook groups to extract risk histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest risk intelligence instruments: my prime picks

A risk intelligence device protects and safeguards a corporation towards various safety dangers, corresponding to cyber assaults, brute pressure assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Once I began evaluating risk intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the most recent safety protocols to take care of sturdy encryption requirements for a corporation’s knowledge and supply real-time risk detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety workforce searches for, corresponding to the necessity to gather and correlate risk knowledge from various sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), business feeds, and inside logs. Consumers additionally search instruments that supply AI-based automation for risk evaluation and contextual risk intelligence to detect ways, methods, and procedures concerning threats. Whereas risk intelligence instruments establish vulnerabilities, ERM options guarantee these insights feed into company-wide resilience.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 risk intelligence instruments available in the market, which supply strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a risk intelligence device price it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a device that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or knowledge breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect risk intelligence device.

In line with Markets and Markets, the risk intelligence market was estimated at USD 11.55 billion in 2025 and is projected to achieve USD 22.97 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 14.7% throughout the forecast interval. 

Additional, these methods combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments, and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and establish and mitigate threats sooner.

With a robust concentrate on safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that it is best to look out for in a risk intelligence device. 

• Automated risk knowledge aggregation and normalization: Once I assess any risk intelligence device, the very first thing I guarantee is that it will possibly create and correlate risk knowledge from a number of sources like OSINT, inside logs, and business feeds. This was an important step in contextualizing threats and standardizing risk patterns for quicker evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, risk knowledge stays chaotic and virtually unusable. An excellent device unifies this data and saves analysts numerous handbook hours of labor.
• Contextualized risk enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A robust risk enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the risk. The platform should layer important metadata, corresponding to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you simply aren’t simply seeing what the risk is but additionally why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that go away customers flying blind.
• Actual-time risk detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a risk intelligence device must be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not by way of integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to struggle AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time risk detection, you’ll be able to transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. Alongside risk feeds and enrichment, many organizations depend on prime MDR providers to actively monitor, detect, and reply to evolving assaults. 
• Tailor-made intelligence in your business and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they permit you to customise risk feeds and intelligence based mostly in your business, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the workforce will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Risk investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be outfitted with a complicated analytics dashboard to show risk circumstances, risk sources, and risk mitigation knowledge. They even have investigation workbenches the place you’ll be able to pivot between risk indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive looking. 
• Collaboration, sharing, and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no workforce operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inside or exterior groups, organizations, and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to kind a strong safety infrastructure. Equally essential is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and affect to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils right down to how a risk intelligence device creates risk knowledge, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of good AI-based breaches to set off risk alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out when it comes to buyer satisfaction, buyer phase, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest risk intelligence device contenders on this record since they’re based mostly on real-time G2 person assessment knowledge.

Out of 30+ greatest risk intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this record. The record under incorporates real critiques from the risk intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present data on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for widespread and rising threats.
• Analyze world threats on various kinds of networks and gadgets 
• Cater risk data to particular IT options.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and utility safety platform that retains your safety methods updated and defends your on-prem or cloud knowledge towards unwarranted assaults or breaches.

As a class chief on G2 based mostly on 127 verified critiques, Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an general buyer satisfaction rating of 72, and 90% of customers are more likely to advocate it to others. 

What instantly impressed me was how simple it was to combine with my current Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was largely easy; no extra configuration is required until you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure providers, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. In addition they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile in case you are not prepared for a giant dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card in your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous sources. I beloved how detailed it was, breaking down particular person sources inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Typically, in case you are fortunate, you’ll be able to even simply click on “Repair” and it auto-remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the mixing with Azure Energetic Listing made id safety tremendous easy.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier offers you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Truthfully, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues bought slightly extra highly effective. I bought entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive utility controls, and community risk detection. The just-in-time entry function is a lifesaver in the event you work with VMs and want to cut back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there may be one other function generally known as Defender for Servers, a premium plan that stunned me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file modifications, however typically misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It will be even higher if they may proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging modifications.

I additionally need to point out their help for risk safety, real-time detection, AI-based risk analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring electronic mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to defend trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

In line with G2 person critiques, Microsoft Defender for Cloud is acknowledged for sturdy multi-cloud safety, although complexity is a recurring theme. Organising superior options or third-party integrations can take time, and a few customers point out occasional false positives that add noise to alerts.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and usefulness. Superior protections are sometimes tied to higher-tier plans, which can really feel steep for smaller companies. The interface additionally evolves shortly, and whereas highly effective, frequent modifications could make navigation much less intuitive.

General, G2 sentiment displays Microsoft Defender for Cloud as a dependable and strong answer for safeguarding knowledge and monitoring safety postures throughout hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the device offers endpoint safety for all gadgets, the deployment course of could be very advanced when configuring safety for iOS gadgets. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It might shortly turn out to be costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the advanced pricing, which may shortly turn out to be costly, and the overload of alerts, usually resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud help is not as strong for non-azure platforms; the preliminary setups may be difficult for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Evaluate, Archi P.

Recorded Future offers a whole breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates risk mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall towards snoops or spies.

As a class chief in risk intelligence software program, Recorded Future has achieved an eloquent buyer satisfaction rating of 97, based mostly on 109 critiques. Round 92% of customers will advocate Recorded Future for intelligence stories, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it felt—like having an analyst workforce working 24/7, consistently feeding me actionable risk insights. It is not simply knowledge dumped from random sources. Recorded Future curates risk intelligence from a formidable mixture of open internet, darkish internet, closed boards, and technical telemetry, and in some way, all of it is sensible.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they don’t seem to be solely real-time but additionally prioritized based mostly on relevance and affect.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mix actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler, too, as all the pieces plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally admire the myriad of options, like their super-detailed risk maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in a giant group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions provide much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand providers, which is nice once I want professional validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

In line with G2 person critiques, Recorded Future is revered for its breadth of risk intelligence, although the interface can really feel overwhelming at first. With a lot knowledge flowing in, customers notice the significance of tuning alerts and filters to keep away from being overloaded.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and have entry. The transfer to a modular mannequin offers flexibility, however superior capabilities like fraud detection or nation-state monitoring are sometimes tied to premium tiers, which may really feel restrictive for smaller safety groups.

General, G2 sentiment displays Recorded Future as a proactive and intelligence-rich platform that empowers safety groups to detect, analyze, and mitigate threats in actual time.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future presents a whole package deal, it comes with a price. I seen that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, you must pay for every further API integration, so the licensing mannequin is expensive.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand new customers to make the most of and work with it with out intensive coaching. The educational curve is steep, notably for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many various modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my workforce does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Evaluate, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that enables corporations to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely affect the general privateness community.

Primarily based on 102 verified G2 critiques, Cyberint has achieved a satisfaction rating of 97, making it a class chief. Additionally, round 93% of customers within the general enterprise phase, consisting of small, mid, and enterprise corporations, are more likely to advocate Cyberint to others.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Risk Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It does not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is strictly what’s essential when integrating it along with your safety operations.

The device’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time risk detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our workforce establish and reply to darkish internet threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert is tagged with the respective risk kind—be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered belongings, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform does not simply throw knowledge at you; it contextualizes it. We notably benefited from their darkish internet intelligence and deep visibility into risk actors’ ways, methods, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 risk hunter embedded in our workforce.

A function I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This sort of foresight has saved us a number of occasions from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively displays social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Truthfully, it’s one of the full suites I’ve seen in a risk intelligence platform.

In line with G2 person critiques, Cyberint earns reward for its risk intelligence protection, although some customers discover the API much less mature than anticipated. Integrating into broader SOAR pipelines can really feel restricted, and customization of dashboards and stories doesn’t all the time present the pliability groups need.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round workflow friction and have depth. Copying or sharing visible knowledge like risk graphs isn’t seamless, and some reviewers point out occasional false positives the place filtering and suggestions might be smoother. Some superior capabilities additionally seem tied to higher-tier plans, which isn’t all the time clearly communicated.

General, G2 sentiment displays Cyberint as a complete digital threat safety answer that helps organizations monitor, detect, and defend towards exterior threats with sturdy protection and premium-tier help.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint offers end-to-end alerts about lively assaults, you must manually replace the standing of alerts, even if in case you have executed so by way of a SIEM system.
• I additionally seen some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

The answer has options that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance remains to be helpful to a corporation.

One other factor is that the extra options is usually a bit regarding when it comes to the group’s funds. However, if such a burden may be dealt with, I absolutely help having this answer in case you are searching for a cyber risk intelligence answer

– Cyberint Evaluate, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Falcon offers anti-ransomware options to take care of safety benchmarks throughout all of your community gadgets and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection underneath its belt.

Primarily based on 130+ verified critiques on G2, CrowdStrike Falcon has achieved a buyer satisfaction score of 76, with over 94% customers prepared to advocate it to others for malware detection, safety validation, and endpoint intelligence.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t bathroom down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly simple, too. I used to be capable of deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t should juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Considered one of its superpowers is real-time risk detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based risk intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Forestall module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the facility of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it offers is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally admire is the single-agent method. I didn’t should overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration by Falcon Highlight, risk looking by way of Falcon OverWatch, or machine management, all the pieces built-in seamlessly.

Should you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed risk looking, which, let’s be sincere, is a game-changer when your workforce is small or overworked. These guys virtually turn out to be your SOC extension.

In line with G2 person critiques, CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its sturdy detection and endpoint safety, although pricing is usually talked about as a barrier. Smaller companies, particularly, notice that the modular pricing construction can really feel costly as wants develop.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to help and usefulness. Whereas many interactions with help are constructive, ticket resolutions can often take longer than anticipated. A number of reviewers additionally point out false positives and notice that the Falcon console, whereas highly effective, comes with a studying curve for brand new customers.

General, G2 sentiment displays CrowdStrike Falcon as a market-leading endpoint safety answer that delivers broad protection and superior detection capabilities.

What I dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an ideal job of offering alerts and updates, we can’t go into a lot element after we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally seen that there are a lot of screens to handle, it’s onerous to achieve each function, and there’s a want to grasp computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“I am not happy with the pricing in comparison with another alternate options, that are slightly bit increased, and it has restricted cellular help.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Evaluate, Bhavanasi N.

Mimecast Superior E mail Safety offers AI-powered knowledge safety towards email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Primarily based on 120 verified critiques on G2, Mimecast has achieved a median buyer satisfaction rating of 70, with 90% customers prepared to advocate it to others for electronic mail safety, electronic mail safety, and safe electronic mail gateway. 

Mimecast is a device that runs quietly within the background, shielding organizations from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It not often lets something malicious slip by.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely subtle impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly underneath the radar.

Considered one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an electronic mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it go by. It actively scans all the pieces embedded within the message. The e-mail continuity function additionally proves helpful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains electronic mail site visitors flowing in order that communication does not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a strong management middle.

You possibly can configure insurance policies right down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and risk stories. I particularly admire the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

In line with G2 person critiques, Mimecast is revered for its sturdy electronic mail safety, although false positives are typically talked about as a downside. A number of customers notice that reputable messages may be flagged as suspicious, and the method of manually whitelisting them isn’t all the time as easy because it might be.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to coverage configuration. Organising superior insurance policies can take trial and error, and a few reviewers point out intermittent login points throughout administration.

General, G2 sentiment displays Mimecast as a scalable and dependable electronic mail safety answer that delivers sturdy safety and encryption for organizations dealing with giant volumes of important communications.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior E mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook assessment.
• One other factor I seen is that Mimecast typically flags reputable emails as suspicious, resulting in communication delays.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior E mail Safety:

The draw back is that the help is slightly off-putting in case you are previous your implementation part. A number of the guidelines and insurance policies are onerous to configure by implementation.

– Mimecast Superior E mail Safety Evaluate, Jessica C.

ThreatLocker is a good device for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It offers a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your knowledge and content material safety workflows and scale back the chance of knowledge breaches or vulnerabilities.

Primarily based on 86 verified critiques, ThreatLocker has a good buyer satisfaction common of 91, making it a pacesetter within the class. Additional, a whopping 97% customers will advocate it to others for intelligence stories, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however ThreatLocker stands out, largely as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a fundamental antivirus or general-purpose device. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the utility degree.

The core function, utility whitelisting, signifies that solely software program we’ve explicitly accepted can run. It offers us instant visibility into unauthorized packages and, in lots of circumstances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other function I exploit closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but additionally about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted utility like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate knowledge directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us stop lateral motion and prohibit how even accepted instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s help workforce has been one of the dependable elements of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration situation or wanted steerage, they had been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of help made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days after we had been nonetheless determining tips on how to construction insurance policies successfully.

In line with G2 person critiques, ThreatLocker is praised for its granular management, although the educational curve may be important. Organising insurance policies requires time and a focus, as customers have to stability blocking threats with out proscribing reputable exercise.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is the quick tempo of updates. Whereas frequent enhancements present the product is evolving, documentation can lag behind, leaving groups to regulate and relearn options extra usually than anticipated.

General, G2 sentiment displays ThreatLocker as a strong safety platform that delivers sturdy coverage enforcement, privilege administration, and compliance-focused auditing.

What I dislike about ThreatLocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero-trust method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals is usually a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety device, the general studying curve might be steep for customers who usually are not accustomed to its interface and sophisticated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about ThreatLocker:

“It is not a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & sources to completely perceive the product and supply wonderful help to your clients. It is not a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend possibly 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– ThreatLocker Evaluate, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered risk intelligence device that detects cyber threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and displays any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance knowledge protection mechanisms.

Primarily based on 50+ verified G2, CloudSEK achieved a median satisfaction rating of 88, with 97% customers prepared to advocate it to others for proactive alerts, deployment, and safety validation. 

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it simple to get a complete snapshot of your risk panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every part from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is introduced in a means that simply is sensible. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me a whole image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I really like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform does not simply warn you about current threats; it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step when you’re making an attempt to stay one step forward of adversaries.

As an illustration, their risk actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but additionally the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure function for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly when you’re coping with recurring or false-positive-prone alerts. 

In line with G2 person critiques, CloudSEK is valued for its fast deployment and robust threat monitoring, although false positives are often famous. The detection engine is usually a bit aggressive, requiring upfront fine-tuning of alert guidelines to keep away from pointless escalations.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to customization and automation. Creating new guidelines or workflows can really feel extra inflexible in comparison with different platforms, and whereas API integrations exist, documentation isn’t all the time as strong as customers count on.

General, G2 sentiment displays CloudSEK as an accessible and scalable platform that delivers complete digital threat monitoring and model safety throughout internet, deep internet, and darkish internet sources.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK presents real-time risk alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule is just not tuned correctly.
• I additionally seen the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re consistently drowning in knowledge that largely seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK might streamline its setup course of and provide extra aggressive pricing, I’d be way more inclined to advocate it.”

– CloudSEK Evaluate, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your knowledge safety workflow hub in a single place with the perfect SIEM software program and select a extra centralized means of monitoring your knowledge remotely.