Join Chalkbeat Colorado’s free every day e-newsletter to get the most recent reporting from us, plus curated information from different Colorado shops, delivered to your inbox.
The group governing highschool sports activities in Colorado has agreed to not sanction faculties or groups from eight conservative-leaning faculty districts and constitution faculties for insurance policies on transgender pupil athletes below a settlement settlement finalized Thursday.
Among the districts and faculties handed insurance policies this 12 months barring transgender college students from becoming a member of groups that align with their gender identification.
The settlement marks the tip of the Colorado Excessive Faculty Actions Affiliation’s involvement in a federal lawsuit spearheaded final spring by the 27,000-student District 49 close to Colorado Springs. The lawsuit will proceed with different defendants, together with Colorado Lawyer Common Phil Weiser and officers from the Colorado Civil Rights Division.
The settlement gained’t have a lot impact on highschool sports activities in Colorado as a result of the Colorado Excessive Faculty Actions Affiliation, also called CHSAA, has by no means had a significant function in figuring out which faculty groups transgender athletes can be part of. The group’s bylaws have for years acknowledged the best of transgender athletes to take part on sports activities groups that match their gender identification and state that the group can assessment district choices on such issues.
However the group has by no means penalized a faculty or district for insurance policies on transgender athletes or dictated what these insurance policies ought to say, a CHSAA spokesperson mentioned in an emailed assertion Thursday.
“Eligibility choices have all the time been left to particular person faculties and districts, which is why being named on this lawsuit was each irritating and pointless,” she mentioned.
The assertion known as the plaintiffs’ choice to sue CHSAA “far more performative than substantive,” and mentioned it gained’t change something concerning the group’s insurance policies, practices, or authority.
The end result of the continued lawsuit between the state and the eight plaintiffs stays to be seen. The state’s anti-discrimination legislation consists of protections based mostly on gender identification.
Quite a few Colorado districts have insurance policies that permit transgender college students to hitch sports activities groups in keeping with their gender identification. Others make choices on a case by case foundation, and extra lately, some bar transgender college students from taking part in on groups that match their gender identification.
Along with CHSAA’s settlement to not sanction the plaintiff districts and faculties for insurance policies on transgender athletes, the settlement states that CHSAA gained’t penalize the plaintiffs for making public statements concerning the “benefits of organic males over organic females in aggressive sports activities” or the chance of “permitting organic males to play contact sports activities with or in opposition to organic females.” The settlement says this provision gained’t apply to statements that advocate violence or demean folks based mostly on gender identification.
The settlement additionally states that if an athlete or staff forfeits a contest in opposition to a transgender athlete or a staff with a transgender member, there shall be no penalty, however the forfeit shall be counted as a loss.
Lastly, the settlement stipulates that the plaintiffs pays CHSAA $60,000 to cowl authorized charges and operational prices.
In a press launch Thursday, District 49 Superintendent Peter Hilts mentioned, “This settlement is a significant step ahead, however our work isn’t performed. We’ll proceed litigation in opposition to the Colorado Civil Rights [Division] and the Lawyer Common’s Workplace to make sure each district in Colorado has the liberty to guard ladies’ sports activities, safeguard pupil privateness, and uphold the spirit of Title IX.”
A number of Republican lawmakers cheered the settlement on social media Thursday.
Rep. Jeff Hurd, who represents western and southern Colorado in Congress, mentioned on X, “At its core, this settlement is about equity, security, and customary sense. Colleges have a accountability to guard younger girls and keep a stage taking part in discipline by upholding primary organic requirements. As a father of daughters, I understand how vital that’s.”
District 49 filed the lawsuit in opposition to the state and CHSAA final Might, the day after its conservative-learning board narrowly handed a controversial coverage banning transgender center and highschool college students from becoming a member of faculty groups that align with their gender identification. The coverage was developed after President Trump’s February government order that threatened to withhold federal funding from any faculty that enables athletes assigned male at start to take part in ladies’ or girls’s sports activities.
Along with District 49, the plaintiffs within the lawsuit embody Colorado Springs 11, Academy 20, Montezuma-Cortez, James Irwin Constitution Colleges, Monument Academy, The Classical Academy, and Training reEnvisioned Board of Cooperative Training Providers.
Ann Schimke is a senior reporter at Chalkbeat. Contact Ann at aschimke@chalkbeat.org.
