I Evaluated the 6 Greatest Low Code Growth Platforms

Once I first heard about low-code improvement, I assumed it was simply one other buzzword, one thing constructed for startups with out dev groups or enterprises chasing pace. 

However as soon as I began digging into how groups really use these platforms, it turned clear: low-code improvement platforms have grow to be the go-to for groups that have to launch quick, pivot rapidly, and cut back reliance on overbooked dev assets. In truth, low-code platforms are projected to scale from $37.39B (2025) to $264.40B by 2032 at a 32.2% CAGR. Early on, I used to be asking myself what’s the greatest low-code surroundings for startups, particularly for groups making an attempt to construct quick with out full-time engineering employees.

The precise low-code platform can empower everybody, from constructing inside dashboards to launching customer-facing apps in document time. However with so many instruments out there, selecting the best one takes greater than evaluating function lists. 

On this information, I’ve evaluated the highest low-code improvement platforms of 2025. Primarily based on actual G2 consumer evaluations, standout options, and scalability, these are the instruments serving to groups construct with out bottlenecks. 

6 greatest low code improvement platforms I’d suggest

With out the proper platform, even the easiest concepts can get caught in a backlog.

Low code improvement instruments promise a sooner, extra accessible manner to convey these concepts to life. They let you design workflows, construct dashboards, and launch practical apps with minimal coding, and in some instances, no code at all. Whether or not you are streamlining inside operations or prototyping a customer-going through device, these platforms meet groups the place they are.

After evaluating product demos, exploring actual G2 evaluations, and evaluating usability, scalability, and integration options, I’ve narrowed it down to six platforms that stand out. Some shine for enterprise-grade complexity, others for how approachable they are for enterprise customers, particularly for those who’re questioning what’s the perfect low-code platform for customized app creation when you do not have full-stack builders readily available.

Let’s break down the platforms I’d really suggest. 

What makes the perfect low code improvement platforms price it: My perspective

As I evaluated totally different low code improvement platforms, I realized that constructing apps isn’t simply about dragging and dropping a few consumer interface (UI) components.

Some platforms actually empowered groups to create scalable, practical instruments with out writing a lot code, whereas others felt extra like restricted type builders dressed up in tech jargon. I realized that the greatest low code instruments don’t simply simplify improvement. They unlock actual agility.

Right here are the options I paid shut consideration to whereas evaluating these platforms:

• Visible interface and reusable parts: A clear, intuitive interface can make or break the constructing expertise. I seemed for platforms that supplied drag-and-drop builders alongside with reusable parts like varieties, charts, and workflows. Platforms that made it straightforward to prototype rapidly and preserve visible consistency throughout apps stood out to me. This type of accessible interface is strictly why many enterprise customers ask me for suggestions on the perfect low-code platform for non-technical customers who wish to construct apps without having to learn to code.
  
• Integration flexibility: Constructing in a vacuum isn’t real looking. I prioritized instruments that made it straightforward to join with exterior programs through APIs or pre-built connectors. Whether or not it was syncing with Salesforce, pulling from a SQL database, or triggering a Slack notification, the smoother the integrations, the higher the platform match into actual enterprise workflows.
• Workflow automation and logic constructing: Some instruments made it useless easy to set up conditional logic, trigger-based mostly workflows, or approval chains with a visible builder. Others buried these options behind developer-solely settings. I gave further factors to platforms that made logic creation accessible, with out compromising on energy or flexibility.
• Position-based entry and governance: Not each consumer ought to have the identical permissions. I seemed for platforms with sturdy entry management and audit logs so groups might collaborate securely. This was particularly necessary for enterprise eventualities the place governance and compliance can’t be an afterthought.
• Scalability and deployment choices: Some platforms have been excellent for MVPs however fell brief when it got here time to scale. I seemed for instruments that supported multi-channel deployment (internet, cellular, PWA), dealt with consumer development, and supplied each cloud and on-premise choices. Bonus if they included built-in testing and versioning instruments.
• Collaboration and model management: Growth doesn’t occur in isolation. I paid consideration to how effectively every platform supported group collaboration. Whether or not that was real-time modifying, shared libraries, or Git integration. The greatest instruments felt like they have been constructed for fusion groups: enterprise customers, designers, and builders working collectively.

Over the span of a number of weeks, I researched and tried shut to twenty+ low code improvement software program. I narrowed down the perfect six based mostly on their options and ease of use. 

To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Present environments to develop customized full-stack enterprise purposes
• Be designed to be used by builders and different technical and semi-technical groups
• Supply a visible UI builder
• Integrate with manufacturing databases and software program as a service (SaaS) suppliers
• Enable builders to jot down customized frontend and backend code utilizing fashionable programming languages
• Assist git-based supply or model management by connecting to git suppliers
• Supply out-of-the-box audit logging and observability

*This knowledge was pulled from G2’s Fall Grid Report in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Salesforce Platform is the type of platform that sparks sturdy opinions and for good cause. Customers constantly spotlight how customizable and scalable it is, and how a lot energy it affords when you know how to faucet into it. However that energy comes with a studying curve, and generally, a value tag that makes smaller groups assume twice.

What stood out throughout tons of of evaluations is Salesforce’s skill to be formed round your enterprise, your shoppers, your workflows. Customers love the flexibility to construct customized objects, tailor web page layouts, and create automated workflows that replicate how their groups really function. Whether or not it’s setting up approval flows utilizing Circulate Builder, automating lead qualification by means of Course of Builder, or going deeper with Apex triggers, the platform provides customers a huge toolkit to streamline work and scale up.

That’s one of many causes I usually hear Salesforce beneficial to these asking which low-code improvement platform is the perfect for enterprise options, because it’s constructed to assist deep customization at scale.

The automation capabilities are a huge win. I noticed a number of customers name out how Salesforce reduces repetitive work and lets their groups focus on higher-impression duties. Flows, in explicit, have been often talked about as a go-to for creating multi-step processes with out writing a lot code. And for groups with technical chops, Apex permits for deeper customization when wanted.

Integration is one other standout power. Customers spoke extremely of how straightforward it is to join Salesforce with different programs. Whether or not that’s by means of native API integrations, middleware, or apps from the AppExchange. This makes it a strong choice for organizations with an present tech stack they don’t need to disrupt. 90% customers fee its platform compatibility extremely. 

One other recurring theme? Scalability. From startups to enterprises, customers felt assured that Salesforce might develop with them. The platform’s construction helps multi-group, multi-division use instances and can deal with complicated setups over time, although, as some famous, technical debt can pile up rapidly if you don’t handle customizations effectively.

That mentioned, there are trade-offs to plan for. Verified evaluations on G2 observe a studying curve, particularly for groups new to Salesforce or low code, with components of Lightning described as much less intuitive and occasional UI modifications including confusion. G2 customers additionally flags whole price of possession: past licensing, line gadgets like knowledge storage, API utilization, and third-party add-ons can add up for small and mid-sized companies.

Even so, Salesforce stays a high-leverage selection when approached intentionally. Groups that put money into admin enablement, create a Middle of Excellence, and map workflows to actual processes are likely to unlock outsized worth. G2 evaluations counsel sensible guardrails, use sandboxes for safer releases, monitor storage/API consumption, and lean on vetted AppExchange packages, to protect pace whereas retaining prices predictable.

What I dislike about Salesforce Platform: 

• G2 customers famous that gross sales instruments can really feel overwhelming. Even although it’s a power, the depth of gross sales options can additionally be too a lot. Some customers discovered it arduous to navigate.
• Whereas the fundamentals are accessible, the educational curve steepens rapidly. Customers shared that the extra superior automations or integrations usually require a technical background to implement easily.

What G2 customers dislike about Salesforce Platform:

“I’ve generally confronted efficiency points as it may be very sluggish whereas utilizing massive complicated datasets. Additionally generally the updates approaching Salesforce platforms provides new options and performance which is nice however they generally breaks the present workflows. One other draw back which our group has mentioned is the licensing prices are costly for premium options and likewise there’s a steep studying curve and it might be generally overwhelming for brand new customers on account of its complexity.”

– Salesforce Platform Evaluate, Anju P. 

From the evaluations I evaluated, one factor is clear. ServiceNow App Engine is serving to groups transfer quick. Whether or not you are a developer or a enterprise consumer with no coding background, customers constantly say this platform makes it simpler to construct and launch purposes throughout the group and it is 4.5/5 score on G2 is a testement to this. 

At the coronary heart of the reward is the low code/no-code expertise. Instruments like App Engine Studio and Circulate Designer come up once more and once more. Customers love being in a position to drag and drop parts, set up automation, and design interfaces with out needing to dive into JavaScript, although it’s there if you want it. The platform’s focus on citizen improvement actually exhibits, and groups respect that enterprise customers can roll up their sleeves and construct issues themselves.

I noticed a lot of optimistic sentiment round ease of use, too. Individuals highlighted the guided templates, prebuilt parts, and UI wizards that assist simplify the studying curve. And as soon as you get going, the pace and effectivity issue kicks in. Customers say they’re delivering apps sooner than ever, thanks to how effectively every part is laid out and built-in.

Talking of integration, that’s one other space the place ServiceNow App Engine shines. The tight alignment with the relaxation of the ServiceNow platform makes it straightforward to join with ITSM, HR, and safety workflows. And due to that, it usually comes up when IT groups are evaluating the best-reviewed low-code platforms for IT departments that want cross-department visibility and safe governance.

On the customization entrance, customers love how they can create customized tables, scoped apps, UI insurance policies, and scripts to tailor the expertise to their actual wants. Some additionally referred to as out replace units and model management as useful instruments for shifting customizations throughout environments, particularly in bigger orgs.

That mentioned, there are limits to plan round. G2 customers observe that debugging in Circulate Designer might be time-consuming; error messages don’t at all times present sufficient context to maneuver rapidly. UI suggestions is blended, too, some groups discover pages busy or sluggish with data-heavy views, often switching to Traditional for options nonetheless migrating. Pricing comes up in G2 consumer suggestions as effectively: add-on tables, premium integrations, and further licenses can increase whole price of possession for smaller groups. Just a few reviewers additionally point out efficiency slowdowns with massive datasets and uneven outcomes from early AI suggestions.

On the upside, groups that lean into greatest practices are likely to unlock sturdy outcomes. G2 customers counsel utilizing subflows and naming conventions to simplify troubleshooting, enabling Efficiency Analytics for heavy dashboards, and staging massive imports by means of IntegrationHub or mid-server patterns. With these guardrails, ServiceNow App Engine stays a high-leverage approach to standardize processes, pace releases, and scale enterprise apps with out sacrificing management.

What I dislike about ServiceNow App Engine: 

• Limits on area sorts, configurations, or useful resource constraints have been talked about often. These boundaries can get in the manner when making an attempt to scale extra complicated apps. 
• Customers felt that customization can generally be restricted by platform constraints, and superior configurations might require extra technical experience than anticipated.

What G2 customers dislike about ServiceNow App Engine: 

“The one draw back is that, as a light-weight consumer, among the extra superior options really feel a bit overwhelming or pointless for my wants. Navigating sure menus could be a bit clunky at instances, however when you get used to it, the general expertise remains to be easy and environment friendly.” 

– ServiceNow App Engine Evaluate, verified consumer. 

From the evaluations I dug into, it’s clear that UiPath Platform for Agenic Automation has constructed one thing fairly particular. For anybody trying to automate enterprise processes, this platform affords a toolkit that’s as deep as it is highly effective. And what I stored seeing throughout the board? It’s constructed to make automation accessible to a wider vary of customers, not simply seasoned builders.

Let’s begin with the consumer expertise, as a result of that’s the place a lot of individuals appear to fall in love with UiPath. The interface is clear, intuitive, and actually, even welcoming if you’re new to the automation world. UiPath Studio, with its drag-and-drop workflows and wealthy library of pre-constructed actions, makes it straightforward to get began. You don’t want to know code to construct one thing significant and for enterprise customers or analysts, that’s a game-changer. 93% of G2 customers fee the applying templates extremely because it gives templates that customers can construct atop. 

Past ease of use, the automation capabilities are the place UiPath actually shines. For consumers asking what low-code service ought to I take advantage of for enterprise automation, UiPath often lands on the prime due to its deep automation layers mixed with versatile low-code design.

Customers praised how effortlessly it handles repetitive workflows, manages background processes, and scales to enterprise-stage complexity. And the automation is not simply rule-based mostly anymore, thanks to Agentic Automation, AI Middle, and Doc Understanding (DU), you can begin weaving in machine studying fashions, deal with unstructured knowledge, and even delegate nuanced selections to software program brokers powered by LLMs and Gen AI.

One other huge spotlight was the UiPath Academy and group. Individuals leaned closely on the coaching modules, discussion board assist, and documentation to ramp up their abilities. A few famous gaps round superior tutorials, however total, the studying assets have been seen as a big plus.

That mentioned, there are price issues. Some customers observe that licensing, particularly for customized bots, AI add-ons, or enterprise options, can really feel heavy for smaller groups, and certification charges add up. The upside: rightsizing bot sorts, consolidating unattended workloads, and phasing AI utilization usually helps groups maintain whole price predictable whereas nonetheless unlocking the most important wins.

On usability, the interface earns reward, however stories point out Studio freezes, slower Excel actions, and efficiency dips with massive datasets or VDI runs. The excellent news is that tuning bots (e.g., background execution, queue-based chunking, fashionable Excel actions, and VDI useful resource insurance policies) usually smooths these tough edges with out re-architecting flows.

Integration is broadly a power, although some groups run into hiccups with Git workflows, error visibility in integration companies, or syncing with exterior platforms. Adopting branching requirements, pull-request gates, and orchestrator logs/alerts, in addition to utilizing official connectors the place potential, tends to stabilize pipelines and shorten debug time.

Internet-net, UiPath fits builders aiming for greater than process automation, groups designing adaptive, AI-powered programs that evolve with the enterprise. With wise licensing technique, efficiency tuning, and disciplined DevOps practices, organizations usually notice the platform’s full worth whereas retaining operational overhead in examine.

What I dislike about UiPath Platform for Agentic Automation:

• Licensing got here up a lot as a ache level. Between bot prices, platform charges, and add-ons, customers felt UiPath might be expensive, particularly for small or mid-sized groups.
• Some customers talked about that constructing is simple, however debugging and testing workflows might be irritating. They needed clearer error messages and extra intuitive check instruments.

What G2 customers dislike about UiPath Platform for Agentic Automation:

“Skilled builders might discover the graphical interface limiting for complicated logic. Updating automation workflows after altering UI in purposes is irritating generally.” 

– UiPath Platform for Agentic Automation Evaluate, Laura C. 

From the evaluations I went by means of, one factor is abundantly clear. OutSystems is constructed for pace. For those who’re particularly on the lookout for the perfect low-code answer for internet app builders, I discovered OutSystems particularly sturdy due to its full-stack flexibility and wealthy integration choices.

The total sentiment is that this platform helps groups construct full-stack purposes dramatically sooner than conventional improvement. And not simply easy apps. We’re speaking about enterprise-grade, built-in, scalable options with actual logic behind them.

The low code/no-code surroundings is the spine of that pace. Customers stored highlighting how intuitive the drag-and-drop interface, pre-constructed widgets, and internet improvement instruments are. Even of us with out deep coding data have been in a position to contribute, whereas seasoned builders appreciated the productiveness good points from skipping boilerplate duties and leaping straight into higher-worth logic.

One of the issues individuals actually appear to love is the ease of integration. Whether or not it is hooking up to a REST API, including SSO or Energetic Listing connectors, or leveraging SOAP companies, OutSystems handles it with minimal problem. That’s big when you’re making an attempt to join to older programs or work throughout a number of apps.

I additionally seen constant appreciation for the built-in options. Issues like accelerators, scaffolding instruments, and reusable parts in the Forge. These make setting up CRUD operations, workflows, and even extra complicated BPT processes manner sooner. Plus, options like CI/CD pipeline assist and modular deployment give it actual improvement cred. 

One other sturdy level was agility. Groups cherished how rapidly they might alter to new necessities, rebuild modules, or spin up proofs of idea. The AI Mentor, used to catch high quality points early, additionally acquired a few nods for serving to with architectural integrity.

That mentioned, there are a couple of gotchas to plan for. Customers observe pricing can really feel unpredictable, particularly at enterprise scale or for smaller groups making an attempt to develop, and a few options in OutSystems Developer Cloud (ODC) haven’t totally caught as much as older editions. Suggestions additionally mentions efficiency hiccups (lag throughout module publishing, sluggish data-heavy screens, occasional hangs), and the UI builder can really feel limiting for pixel-perfect front-end work.

The upside: groups report good outcomes by sizing infrastructure appropriately, caching and indexing knowledge, splitting massive modules, and lengthening UI with React/CSS the place finer management is required, sensible methods to easy these edges with out abandoning the platform’s pace benefits.

Internet-net, if you have to transfer quick whereas retaining sturdy enterprise capabilities, OutSystems stays a robust contender. With price guardrails, efficiency tuning, and a plan for ODC function parity, many groups proceed to unlock fast supply, constant governance, and a cleaner path from prototype to manufacturing.

What I dislike about OutSystems: 

• Some customers mentioned the newer ODC platform hasn’t caught up with the performance of the authentic surroundings. It’s promising, however not fairly there but for heavy-responsibility use.
• There’s frequent suggestions round licensing. Customers discovered it costly and never at all times clear, particularly in relation to scaling or unlocking particular options.

What G2 customers dislike about OutSystems: 

“Efficiency points in complicated purposes: The platform works effectively for purposes generally, however efficiency points can come up when coping with very complicated programs. Akin to sluggish load instances.” 

– OutSystems Evaluate, verified consumer. 

Microsoft Energy Apps is like a quick monitor to constructing apps, particularly if you already stay in the Microsoft world. It’s not making an attempt to change full-stack improvement, however for enterprise customers and technical of us who need to construct quick, automate rapidly, and join every part in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, it’s a highly effective device.

What individuals constantly spotlight is how low code improvement actually delivers right here. Customers respect the drag-and-drop interface, the simplicity of the logic setup, and the manner built-in templates and themes assist you spin up practical apps with out beginning from scratch. It’s not simply for IT. Many customers say Energy Apps empowered groups throughout departments to prototype apps with out needing a developer each time. In my testing, it stood out as a number one low-code device for creating workplace apps, particularly for corporations already working closely inside Microsoft 365.

The integration with Microsoft companies is one of its largest strengths. You can join your app instantly to SharePoint, Excel, Microsoft Groups, Dataverse, and even convey in Energy BI for visualizations. Individuals cherished how seamless it felt, pulling in knowledge from OneDrive, triggering flows by means of Energy Automate, or even setting up customized approvals proper in Outlook. If you are already utilizing Microsoft merchandise, Energy Apps suits proper into your workflow with out any further configuration.

Velocity is one other huge win. Many customers mentioned they have been in a position to go from thought to stay prototype in a matter of hours. That pace doesn’t simply come from templates, it comes from how the platform helps reusability of parts and the simplicity of knowledge bindings and UI logic.

Documentation and group assist additionally got here up positively in a number of evaluations. Whether or not it is utilizing official Microsoft docs or leaning on boards, customers appreciated having assets to flip to, particularly when they hit a snag throughout automation or method creation.

That mentioned, there are trade-offs to plan for. G2 customers point out licensing complexity, prices can rise with premium connectors, further environments, or Dataverse utilization, and a few groups observe sluggish web page masses with massive datasets or heavy logic, particularly on cellular. Even in a low-code world, superior work nonetheless carries a ramp: Energy FX, Dataverse schema, and debugging flows in Energy Automate take time. A recurring theme is ecosystem lock-in; Energy Apps works greatest when the remainder of your toolkit can also be Microsoft.

Even so, Energy Apps stays a robust choose for organizations already invested in Microsoft 365. Groups that design lean knowledge fashions, paginate queries, cache outcomes, and standardize surroundings technique usually see dependable efficiency and predictable prices. For corporations prioritizing cellular performance, it’s often listed among the many top-rated low-code choices for cellular when paired with the broader Energy Platform, making it a strong launchpad for contemporary enterprise apps.

What I dislike about Microsoft Energy Apps: 

• There is a studying curve. Even although it’s low code, customers mentioned constructing extra superior apps required a strong understanding of Energy FX, connectors, and surroundings configurations, which isn’t at all times beginner-pleasant.
• A number of customers talked about sluggish efficiency when coping with massive datasets or loading screens on cellular. It’s a standard friction level that impacts the consumer expertise.

What G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Energy Apps: 

“One drawback is that fixing the problems with complicated operations within the Energy Apps will not be straightforward because of the lack of an environment friendly debugger. Resulting from a number of knowledge inputs and quite a few transformations, it’s tough to search out out failure factors if there isn’t any correct perception into how the system capabilities at each step of the method.” 

– Microsoft Energy Apps Evaluate, Noemi D. 

Quickbase stands out as a platform constructed for groups that need management with out the coding burden. What customers love most is how versatile it is when it comes to constructing customized workflows, organizing knowledge, and adapting apps to match the manner their enterprise really operates.

Customers actually worth how Quickbase lets them tailor apps down to the area and desk stage. Whether or not you’re monitoring stock, managing initiatives, dealing with vendor onboarding, or all of the above, Quickbase provides you the instruments to construct it your manner. I noticed lots of customers calling out the ease of creating customized varieties, designing workflows, and constructing dashboards that really imply one thing to their group.

The low code/no-code method is one other huge win. Customers talked about how empowering it feels to construct functioning apps with out deep technical data. Customers talked about how empowering it feels to construct functioning apps with out deep technical data. That’s precisely why Quickbase usually will get beneficial as the perfect low-code platform for small enterprise apps the place inside groups want management however can’t dedicate full developer assets.