How will the Trump administration’s cuts to HIV analysis impression the progress that is been made in the direction of ending the epidemic within the U.S.?
PIEN HUANG, HOST:
Throughout his first time period, President Trump laid out a daring proposal throughout a State of the Union handle.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: My price range will ask Democrats and Republicans to make the wanted dedication to remove the HIV epidemic in the USA inside 10 years. Now we have made unimaginable strides, unimaginable.
(APPLAUSE)
HUANG: The Trump administration’s objective of eliminating HIV within the U.S. led to a swell of analysis and funding to review the virus. However within the opening months of his second time period, the Trump administration slashed 1000’s of Public Well being jobs and gutted funding for scientific analysis, together with grants and funds for HIV and AIDS analysis. What does this imply for the way forward for HIV analysis within the U.S.? Dr. John Brooks is the previous chief medical officer to the CDC’s division of HIV prevention, and he joins me now. Dr. Brooks, welcome to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.
JOHN BROOKS: Properly, Pien, thanks. It is a pleasure to be right here, and I recognize your consideration to this concern.
HUANG: So to begin with, are you able to give us a way of the place HIV analysis stood earlier than these cuts?
BROOKS: Properly, you realize, HIV analysis has been in place because the discovery of the virus as the reason for superior HIV illness, which we used to name AIDS. And it is, you realize, made unimaginable strides. We are actually at a spot, as a result of constant funding via largely federal help, that is found superb medication that may assist us each deal with HIV to maintain an individual wholesome but additionally to forestall HIV.
HUANG: Have been there any therapies that we had been type of – you realize, you are speaking about therapies which have been developed and are on the market working for individuals. Was there something additionally that was within the works that we have not fairly gotten to but?
BROOKS: Yeah, so a few essential issues. To start with, there was a decadeslong pursuit of an HIV vaccine, and that analysis, in addition to analysis for an HIV remedy, seems to have been canceled. That was largely analysis funded by the NIH. A vaccine can be unimaginable if we might have it – huge public well being impression, gigantic financial advantages, in addition to the scientific developments it should present and has supplied previously. Ditto for an HIV remedy. Secondly, the best way that we may give individuals medication, each to deal with their an infection and to guard individuals from getting contaminated, are advancing very quickly. A brand new drug, lenacapavir, has lately been accepted not just for treating but additionally for stopping HIV. And uniquely, it is easy to manage. It is about as simple to manage as a vaccine, and it will possibly shield an individual for as much as six months.
HUANG: So lowering or eliminating HIV requires a two-pronged strategy. There’s the prevention a part of it after which the therapy a part of it. And I am questioning the way you see these cuts impacting every of these approaches.
BROOKS: One of many issues that worries me is that the main target of the present administration with regard to HIV – which by the way is included as a brand new a part of the Administration for a Wholesome America – that HIV bureau or division, no matter it is finally named, appears extremely targeted on simply therapy. However I feel these of us who work in infectious ailments know effectively that therapy isn’t going to be the best way you are going to get out of any epidemic. Prevention is an important element. And what we’re seeing now’s notably round prevention analysis and prevention actions, an actual discount in what’s being performed.
HUANG: So given the place we’re, and that, you realize, the truth that Trump’s initiative to remove HIV within the U.S. remains to be being funded, such as you mentioned, possibly below the brand new Administration for a Wholesome America, whilst different HIV analysis is being lower, do you suppose the U.S. can nonetheless attain this objective of eliminating HIV by 2030?
BROOKS: Properly, I am a born optimist, and I’m hopeful. However truthfully, I feel that with the cuts being made in analysis and, particularly, the outstanding and, for my part, draconian cuts being made to federal funding in HIV prevention, are going to result in a rise in new HIV infections nationally. Now we have made nice strides on this nation below the president’s first-term signature initiative to remove the HIV epidemic in America. Within the first 4 years that it was in impact, we have seen a 12% decline in new infections nationally and a 19% decline in deaths as a result of HIV.
HUANG: It feels like what you are saying, Dr. Brooks, is that present HIV sufferers will nonetheless have the ability to entry therapy, however you are notably anxious concerning the prevention a part of it, the prevention of latest individuals from getting HIV. Is that proper?
BROOKS: That is completely proper. You realize, PrEP, this treatment that’s given to forestall an infection – it stands for pre-exposure prophylaxis – has made terrific advances. There is a new drug that is on the market that you simply solely need to take twice a yr via injection that may be administered as simply as a vaccine. Nevertheless, the drug could also be out there, and it could be very potent, however not everyone has entry to it. To achieve this drug and to get that safety, you should remember that you’re in danger for HIV and be taught that you do not have HIV, so the drug can shield you. And you then want to have the ability to get to a spot that may administer it, you want to have the ability to afford it, and also you want to have the ability to keep engaged within the type of care that you should administer the drug so long as you want it.
HUANG: That is Dr. John Brooks, former chief medical officer to the CDC’s Division of HIV Prevention. Dr. Brooks, thanks for becoming a member of us.
BROOKS: Thanks very a lot. Take care.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
